You are currently browsing the MOONHOAX posts tagged: meeting


On the road: January 2012 AAS meeting, Wednesday recap

Even though the American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting still has another day of research presentations and invited talks, today was the last day of press conferences – and the organizers made sure it was a good one.

Virginia Trimble, Eric Mamajek, John Johnson, and William Welsh (left to right) presented during the extrasolar planet press conference at AAS. // Photo by Liz Kruesi.Members of the Kepler mission to discover extrasolar planets revealed some exciting new finds. William Welsh of San Diego State University in California announced two more cases of an exoplanet orbiting a double star system — the “Tatooine” situation. Each of these worlds (Kepler-34b and Kepler-35b) are roughly Saturn-sized, and in the first example, the exoplanet orbits two stars similar to the Sun. While the planet in the previous announcement (Kepler-16b, in September) was just outside its stellar habitable zone (HZ), Kepler-34b is a bit too close to its stars to be within the HZ. Welsh added that he and colleagues expect there to be millions more of these cases, where a planet orbits a double star, and that in the next few dozen discoveries he expects to find one in its system’s HZ.

At the same press conference, John Johnson of the Kepler team announced a planetary system containing three worlds smaller than Earth, and orbiting a red dwarf star about 13 percent the size of the Sun. The innermost planet orbits its star (KOI 961) in about 10.8 hours, and astronomers haven’t yet determined the orbital period of the other two planets, but they know both are less than two days.

After a third exoplanet announcement of an extrasolar dusty disk (with a ring system) more than 400 light-years away, Virginia Trimble, an astronomer and science historian at the University of California, Irvine, spoke about how astronomy is changing due to recent discoveries. (She specifically spoke of “paradigm shifts.” While at college, all freshmen were required to read Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, and so I felt that I really got what Trimble was saying.) 

Newly discovered Kepler-34b, shown in this illustration, orbits binary stars that are similar to the Sun. // Photo by David A. Aguilar (CfA)While the topic of exoplanets seems to dominate this blog post, it certainly wasn’t the only research area discussed at today’s meeting. Steven Rodney of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, announced the discovery of the most distant type 1a supernova yet. It exploded when the universe was just about 4.2 billion years old, and its light has redshifted out of visible and into infrared due to the universe’s expansion. The star that evolved into this supernova was younger than the Sun is currently (which is about 4.5 billion years) when it exploded. Astronomers expect to find supernovae in data from when the universe was just 3 billion years old.

So those were some of the science highlights of my third full day at the AAS meeting in Austin, Texas. And today, I also finally got to enjoy some tasty Texas BBQ.

Read about my Tuesday at AAS and Monday at AAS here.


Astronomy.com blog

On the road: January 2012 AAS meeting, Tuesday recap

Today was another packed day — but that seems to be the norm at the American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting. The first invited talk echoed a topic that one of today’s press conferences covered: the status of the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. After three years in orbit, the observatory has identified more than 1,870 gamma-ray objects, including many types that hadn't been discovered before.

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Observatory's data at its highest energies reveal the outline of the giant gamma-ray bubbles discovered in 2010. // Photo byNASA/DOE/Fermi LAT CollaborationThe Fermi team also released its view of a largely unexplored region of high-energy astrophysics. These energies are greater than 10 billion electronvolts and extend up to about 300 billion electron volts (visible light has an energy of about 2 or 3 electronvolts). At these energies, the Fermi all-sky map also shows signatures of the giant gamma-ray bubbles quite clearly. The observatory has found 496 objects in this energy region, and 168 are unidentified. Dave Thompson, Fermi deputy project scientist, added that multiwavelength observations of these unknown objects are crucial to figuring out what they are.

A later press conference focused on (pun intended) the lower end of the electromagnetic spectrum — infrared radiation. Astronomers from four projects released gorgeous images that are also jam-packed with information about star formation. Scientists can observe dust and thus trace the cold raw material that eventually becomes hot stars, and observe young stars forming behind dust clouds, using infrared light.

These four projects look at slightly different wavelengths, and so astronomers can combine data from different telescopes to see great detail. One of the observations presented today did just that: Data from both the European Space Agency’s Herschel satellite and NASA’s Spitzer telescope show current and potential sites of star formation in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds. The images show detail about 5 light-years across.

Tuesday's second press conference focused on infrared radiation. // Photo by Liz Kruesi.Another project used Spitzer to survey the Cygnus X star-formation region, which contains all phases of star creation. The released image covers about 25 square degrees (100 times the size of the Full Moon) and contains some 4 million stars. Astronomers with the project specifically were looking for stellar objects in the early stages of formation.

In the same press conference, Xavier Koenig of the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) released new findings about how massive stars form. His team selected a sample of regions in a 1,000-square-degree mosaic of WISE data, and mapped the distributions of young stars in those regions. The data indicate that stars form in a chain reaction once nearby massive star formation begins.

Tuesday included many other highlights — such as a great talk by Gaspar Bakos of Princeton University. He gave an overview of the extrasolar planet search project HATNet, which has been searching for nearly 10 years for planets passing in front of their stars. It’s found about 30 so far. This project is just one case of small telescopes doing big science. (The automated telescope system is made up of 4-inch and 8-inch scopes across the globe.)

Tomorrow promises another exciting day filled with announcements, poster presentations, and interesting talks.

Read about my recap of Monday at AAS here.


Astronomy.com blog

On the road: January 2012 AAS meeting, Monday recap

I’ve successfully survived the first full day of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting. I managed to attend all three press conferences, two invited talks, a session on extrasolar planets, a few science education presentations, and the poster exhibition hall. Plus, I caught up with a few fellow science journalists and met with an associate editor of our sister publication, Discover magazine.

The LOFAR project has begun taking data, and will be completely installed later this year. // Photo by Liz KruesiAt the first press conference of the day, astronomers released the largest dark matter maps yet. They combined five years of observations from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope showing how the invisible dark matter in massive galaxy clusters warps background radiation. Each map is comparable to the size of the palm of your hand. The team released two-dimensional maps today, but they’ve also collected three-dimensional data and plan on incorporating this later.

After the dark matter announcement, I listened in on a few presentations about extrasolar planets. A major theme was how important it is to understand the star when investigating the planets orbiting it. The star is the system’s prime energy and gravity source, and its characteristics (especially temperature) define the system’s habitable zone — where water could possibly exist on a world’s surface. Along those lines, a talk by Billy Quarles of the University of Texas at Arlington described the habitability of the Kepler-16 system. His team suggested astronomers look to see if a moon is orbiting the Saturn-sized Kepler-16b, because if so, it could be habitable.

After lunch, we reconvened for another press conference — this one about the LOFAR radio telescope. This project is located in the Netherlands, a seemingly unusual place for a radio observatory. However, with advanced computer processing, it has so far been successful at filtering out background radio sound (although the motion of windmill blades seems to cause some problems). The LOFAR team announced today that the project’s hardware will be fully installed and online later this year, and LOFAR has already begun taking data in two bands: the low band looks at frequencies between 30 and 75 Megahertz (MHz), and the high band observes between 115 and 185 MHz. There’s a gap between 75 and 115 MHz because of FM radio signals.

Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg gave the last talk of the evening on Monday January 9. // Photo by Liz KruesiThe last session of the night — a public talk by Steven Weinberg, Nobel laureate of physics — was great, but also a bit depressing. Titled “Big science in crisis,” he focused on how difficult it is for huge science projects (such as particle accelerators and space observatories) to get funding. The current financial climate, combined with the requirement to cut 8 percent of the federal non-defense budget at the end of the year, means it will only get harder.

So spread your excitement for science, and get others interested in it. Until the public perception changes and people realize that science is important, and that it leads to incredible technology, funding will continue to decrease.


Astronomy.com blog

American Astronomical Society January 2012 meeting preview

Well, it’s that time of the year again — when thousands of astronomers convene to present their new findings. This year, the American Astronomical Society (AAS) winter meeting takes place in Austin, Texas. It officially begins Sunday the 8th, which is when I head down. I lived in Austin for a year and a half before returning to Astronomy magazine, and I am excited to visit the city again. (Texas BBQ is definitely one reason.)

Some 2,800 astronomers are expected to attend the AAS conference, and the press schedule looks packed with new discoveries. There are also a few presentations about the state of huge projects (like the James Webb Space Telescope [Hubble’s successor] and the Kepler mission to detect extrasolar planets) and other public events, so if you’re in the Austin area for those, consider heading over to the convention center.

While at the conference, I’ll be blogging and tweeting (@Astronomymag) to report new science findings. It’s also a great time to catch up with the astronomers I’ve communicated with for our Ask Astro column and other articles in the magazine (plus my previous professors and fellow science writers).


Astronomy.com blog

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Tuesday recap

After recovering from Monday’s exertions, I began my second day at the 218th American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting feeling fresh. Science, especially relating to the worlds around other stars, seemed to be more in focus Tuesday, though amateurs still had their moments to shine.

A simple device mimics a system of transiting exoplanets, helping illustrate exactly what the Kepler mission looks for. // Bill Andrews photoFor instance, the first of the day’s talks, “The Pan-STARRS Wide-Field Imaging Survey” by Nicholas Keiser of the University of Hawaii’s Institute for Astronomy, ended with a question from the audience about the possible assistance that a citizen science project like Galaxy Zoo could provide. Keiser enthusiastically agreed, saying, “Getting non-astronomers involved in astronomy seems to be a highly productive thing.” The talk itself was all about the Panoramic Survey Telescope & Rapid Response System, or Pan-STARRS for short: its specs, goals, and some of its first data and results. (Its biggest aim is to search for potentially life-destroying asteroids, and so far, so good: “None of them are going to hit us,” Keiser said. “Yet.”)

But a conference isn’t all talks and field trips — one of my favorite parts of these things is talking face to face at the poster sessions with some of the people actually doing science. The Kepler mission and its exoplanet search figured prominently in my day’s plans, so I chatted with some of the representatives from SETI (the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence) and Kepler, even getting a chance to play with a simple model of an exoplanet system. By turning a small crank, visitors could move two pea-sized planets around a light bulb, with a nearby light detector showing the corresponding drop in brightness from the transitions across the “star.” What a nifty way to show what Kepler looks for!

I also got a chance to speak with Prabal (rhymes with “trouble”) Saxena of George Mason University, who presented a poster about one of the most distant moons in the solar system, titled “An External Source for Charon’s Atmosphere: Accretion of Pluto’s Atmosphere.” It’s an exciting theory, and not just because it will be experimentally verified (or not) when NASA’s New Horizons probe reaches the Pluto-Charon system in 2015. If Saxena is right, this process of atmospheric accretion could have a significant impact on planetary science. (He also said Astronomy magazine helped him get interested in the subject to begin with; neat!)

The poster sessions at the 218th meeting of the American Astronomical Society are among my favorite events — you never know what interesting research you’ll come across! // Elizabeth Andrews photoNext up was the day’s first official exoplanet talk, “Kepler and the Architecture of Planetary Systems,” which detailed some of the newly discovered properties of the multi-planet systems the Kepler mission has uncovered. “I should be saying ‘planet candidates,' ” said the first speaker, David Latham of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, but he felt almost all of them would prove to be actual planets anyway. Astronomers can now calculate the various eccentricities, orbital resonances, and orbital inclinations of planets within the nearly 200 known multi-exoplanet systems, which are all important in theorizing their formation. The final speaker of this session, Jason Steffen of Fermilab in Illinois, suspects there will turn out to be “more than one way to form a planetary system.”

Things got a little emotional during the Henry Norris Russell Lectureship, as both AAS President Debra Elmegreen and the honoree Margaret Geller of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Tucson, Arizona, remembered their longtime friend and collaborator, former AAS President John Huchra. He was supposed to introduce Geller, but his October death took everyone by surprise, so both speakers understandably struggled to keep their composure at times. Geller even went so far as to honor Huchra with a moment of silence, and it was clear she was dedicating the lecture to him. Titled “Mapping the Universe with Redshift Surveys and Weak Lensing,” the actual talk detailed Geller and Huchra’s early exploration of the universe, and the structures they discovered. Some of the details were a little dense, and when Geller at one point said, “Nothing is simple when you’re observing the universe,” I couldn’t help but agree.

After lunch, I headed to a session devoted to various ways of promoting “Astronomy Education & Public Outreach,” a subject Astronomy knows a little something about. All kinds of great ideas came up, from top-down NASA initiatives, to plans to get kids not just excited about science but actually performing real research, to suggestions for college cosmology curricula, re-evaluating what we mean by a “learning disability,” to an individual working hard to promote astronomy to those who might not have expected to like it (this last was Astronomy guest blogger Donald Lubowich of Hofstra University). It’s great to see so much interest in making sure the public stays interested.

This “family portrait” displays all the planet candidates the Kepler Mission has found as they transit (orbit in front of) their parent star, with our Sun and Jupiter displayed alone in the second row. // Photo by NASA/Kepler Science Team/Jason RoweNext was a double dose of heavy science. First, Chris Carilli and Rick Perley, both of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Socorro, New Mexico, tag-teamed through their talk, “Early Science with the Expanded Very Large Array (EVLA).” Carilli shared some of the science that’s already come from the 30-year-old array’s total overhaul, “effectively re-imagining” what’s possible in terms of studying star formation, molecular gas, and some of the most distant galaxies; Perley stuck to the upgrades and what they mean for future research, even going so far as to provide a “how to” on scheduling observing time on the EVLA.

Immediately following that was the day’s last session on exoplanets, “Extrasolar Planets: Detection and Characterization.” Now that astronomers have had a few months to play with the extensive Kepler data (released in February), they can make ever more interesting conclusions on the subject (such as the claim from William Borucki of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, that nearly every candidate star will have, on average, 0.34 planet orbiting it). With the Spitzer Space Telescope helping characterize these potential other worlds and ever-improving technology to find a needle-like planet in haystack-like dusty debris, the future of exoplanet research looks bright — no wonder there’s always so many people at these talks!

The day’s final event was the SPD Hale Prize lecture, “The Sun’s Magnetic Surface,” given by Hendrik Spruit of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Garching, Germany. Not too many people attended the talk, which is too bad because they missed the random free food that accompanied it (Asian appetizers before and cakes after). Spruit discussed a few ideas behind solar behavior, and frankly described the problems behind much of the standard views. “Observations rule out the main types of models,” he said, insisting that “the magnetic field is not weak!” This alters current views behind sunspot formation and the importance of convection and diffusion in modeling behavior at the Sun’s surface. Spruit acknowledged that his views have their problems, too, but he jovially made it clear that the standard views were more wrong.

And that was Tuesday! It’s hard to believe there’s just one more full day left, but I’ll do my best to keep you updated. And, as always, be sure to follow my live tweets from the conference on @AstronomyMag (#AAS218).

Related blogs:
On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Monday recap

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Sunday recap

 


Astronomy.com blog

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Wednesday recap

Somehow, the third and final full day of the 218th meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) has come and gone. It seems like just yesterday that I got to beautiful, if not quite sunny, Boston, Massachusetts!

The day began with an unusual talk, “Demographics in Astronomy and Astrophysics.” James Ulvestad of the National Science Foundation (NSF) was careful to stress he was giving his own views and didn’t speak for the NSF as a whole. He spoke about the growing fragmentation of the astronomy community, something he found “a little bit disturbing,” and the huge number of astronomy Ph.D.’s given in relation to the number of academic positions available in the United States (more than 4 times as many degrees as jobs). “This is not something to be depressed about,” he stressed. “You just need to be aware of the situation.” Individual astronomers and organizations need to do a better job of illuminating students on the variety of nonacademic positions out there, and to be more supportive of them.

Naturally, in a talk about demographics, Ulvestad also deplored the lack of minorities within the field of astronomy, calling the representation by women and racial minorities “abysmal.” It’s easy to forget in the 21st century how important it still is to be inclusive of these apparently marginalized folks, but diversity remains a key to innovation, he said, so astronomers need to work on this now. I found the call to arms rousing, but I noticed a guy in the row in front of me buying tickets to Boston’s Duck Tours during the talk, so perhaps Ulvestad has his work cut out for him.

The most complete map of the local universe in 3-D is, naturally, a beautiful sight by itself (purple dots are nearer galaxies, extending through the rainbow to red dots as the farthest galaxies). The gap in the middle is from the Milky Way’s stars and dust, which obscure farther galaxies. // Map by T. H. Jarrett (IPAC/SSC)Up next was a press conference featuring a variety of topics: “An astronomical assortment.” The legacy of former AAS President John Huchra again came up with the first topic, which concerned the newly released 2MASS Redshift Survey that has produced the most complete 3-D map of the local universe. “This is really John’s survey,” said Karen Masters of the University of Portsmouth in the United Kingdom; he was the driving force behind it and even wrote most of the upcoming journal paper describing the survey.

Following that, Farid Salama of NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, spoke about the “Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Translucent Interstellar Clouds” — or, basically, the dirt between stars. For the first time, recent lab experiments have allowed astronomers to compare individual light profiles of these complex molecules in space to known ones in the lab, enabling them to better understand the makeup of this pervasive dust.

For the final “astronomical assortment,” Peter Foukal of Heliophysics, Inc., brought it all home with a metaphorical look at the Sun (which, remember, you should never do literally). Recent breakthroughs in solar brightness observations suggest our star may have been at least partially responsible for the “Little Ice Age” between roughly 1550 and 1850. Tuesday night’s final speaker, Hendrik Spruit, hinted at such a connection, but didn’t say much beyond how “controversial and political” a theory it was, so it was nice to hear a bit more about this interesting idea.

Debra Fischer of Yale University spoke about exoplanets past and present Wednesday at the 218th meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS). // Bill Andrews photoI then managed to squeeze in one more exoplanet talk for the week, and this one happened to feature a familiar face — or at least a familiar rhetorical style. Yale University’s Debra Fischer, who wrote Astronomy’s October 2010 cover story, “How astronomers will find another Earth,” gave a lecture titled “From Hot Jupiters to Habitable Worlds.” As she eyed the packed crowd, she said “This is a field that has exploded,” and the various exoplanet-related sessions (and their popularity) would seem to bear her out. She started with the history of exoplanet research and moved through to the present era, exploring the various methods of discovery, before getting to the current state of knowledge. Perhaps the most important recent development is the relative abundance of rocky, earthlike worlds out there, which until recently had been overshadowed by the bigger, gassier “hot Jupiter” type planets. “Earths are pretty common,” she said, with about 7 times as many super Earths as Jupiters. “That’s pretty exciting.”

Speaking of which, the next session I attended focused on ways to use astronomy to help make college physics classes more interesting. The speakers elaborated on various means, such as cosmology, planetary nebulae, and yes, even exoplanets, to teach the basic concepts of physics. As Harvard’s David Charbonneau put it, why use meaningless balls and frictionless planes to illustrate these ideas when you can use distant worlds and galaxies instead? The talks focused a little too heavily on specific teaching advice for my taste, but it was still interesting to learn new and creative ways this old science can be taught.

The final talk returned to one of my — and everyone else’s, it seems —favorite topics as Ryan Hickox of Durham University in the United Kingdom discussed “What Drives the Growth of Black Holes?” Beginning with the definitions of a black hole, their supermassive, super-bright, and galaxy-centering forms as Active Galactic Nuclei, and even their ultra-bright iterations as quasars, Hickox led the packed audience through what’s presently known about these enigmatic objects. In particular, he described the theory that quasar galaxies (perhaps brought on by galactic mergers) could be an intermediate step between younger star-forming bluer galaxies and older “dead” red galaxies. By switching between admittedly primitive cartoon models and cutting-edge visual simulations, Hickox did a great job explaining such a complex topic to the general audience.

The AAS tried something new this time around, holding a closing reception full of food, fun, and door prizes. Early judgments call it a success. // Elizabeth Zakszewski photoAnd then, once again, it was time to venture to the nearby Fairmont Copley Plaza, this time for the closing reception (the timing of which made me feel a little bad for Thursday’s presenters). It was actually the first time AAS has tried having a closing reception, and between the nine door prizes, the delicious free food (more crab cakes!), and the friendly atmosphere, I’d say it was a good idea (even if I didn’t win anything).

Well, that’s it! I don’t know how the week has gone by so quickly [insert relativity joke here], but my time in Boston is almost at an end. And just like last time, I’ll be sorry to leave. Yet I’m starting to get a little homesick for Wisconsin by now, so I’ll probably be all right.

Related blogs
On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Tuesday recap

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Monday recap

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Sunday recap


Astronomy.com blog

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Sunday recap

The 218th meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) officially began Sunday, with the opening reception taking place in Boston’s Fairmont Copley Plaza (just a stone’s throw from the famous Boston Common, and right next door to the shapely Hancock tower). It’s a real thrill staying and, ostensibly, working so close to one of Beantown’s most famous landmarks, and really helps drive home that I’m back in familiar territory.

The crowds gathered for the opening reception of the 218th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Boston, Massachusetts, at the Fairmont Copley Plaza’s Grand Ballroom. // Bill Andrews photoThe reception, as in years past, wasn’t so much a ceremony as just a chance for attendees to get together and mingle, chat, network, etc. No official bell marked the start of the conference, as I’d vaguely imagined last year before attending my first AAS meeting, and that’s fine. This crowd doesn’t seem overly concerned with formality, which makes sense because the AAS conference also meets with the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO), a group of almost professional-level amateur astronomers.

And so, the reception began slowly, in waves, as everyone entered the room and decided which food to eat first. This being Boston, we could smell the seafood selection before we saw it, and got to choose from crab cakes, lobster ravioli, cod and potato cakes, as well as traditional cocktail party fair like roast beef and an assortment of cold meats and cheeses. Hundreds of scientists, professors, students, amateurs, and even a few lucky members of the press crowded in and partook, enjoying the last night before the conference begins proper Monday morning.

Because I just got off the plane Sunday, I didn’t have much time to do anything except attend the aforementioned festivities. Everyone seemed excited about the talks and announcements coming this week, and Monday’s schedule looks especially crowded (a full day of talks, press conferences, and meetings — including a rumored talk with a component delivered in song — plus a chance to visit the Boston Museum of Science’s Charles Hayden Planetarium, plus an open house at the Cambridge headquarters of the AAVSO). I’m sure Sunday will prove to be my lightest day here, which is just how I like it!

Keep checking back for more reports from the AAS meeting, and be sure to follow @AstronomyMag for live tweet updates (#AAS218).

Related blog
On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting preview


Astronomy.com blog

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Monday recap

There was something for everyone Monday at the first full day of the 218th meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) in Boston, Massachusetts, held jointly with the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO). Fittingly, both AAVSO Director Arne Henden and AAS President Debra Elmegreen handled the first talk, the Welcoming Address (which is about as close to the “official bell” I still naively expect at the opening reception). As it turned out, the scientist/amateur (not that Henden is any kind of amateur!) connection lasted almost all day.

American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Director Arne Henden popped up numerous times throughout my first day of the American Astronomical Society’s 218th meeting in Boston, Massachusetts. Here, he’s in the midst of a press conference, explaining the AAVSO’s contribution to a NASA project to have the Hubble Space Telescope observe the star Hubble variable 1. // Elizabeth Andrews photoImmediately after the welcome, Elmegreen introduced Malcolm Longair of the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, England, who discussed some of the subject’s long-term goals in his talk, “The 2050 Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics.” He advised, “Be persistent and patient and never give up,” and keep trying to persuade the government of “the societal benefit of the astronomical enterprise.” He also gave a subtle shout-out to the importance of smaller and midscale telescopes, a perfect prelude to the next session I attended.

Led by the AAVSO, “Astrophysics with Small Telescopes” discussed, well, the astrophysics possible through small scopes. Many of Astronomy’s readers would have felt at home during these talks, which extolled amateur observers and their dedication, ingenuity, and even technical skills. Henden returned for the first science talk, “Contributions by Citizen Scientists to Astronomy,” which outlined the essential ways amateurs can help, including long-term deep-sky imaging, variable-star observing, and planetary monitoring (such as Australia’s Anthony Wesley’s numerous discoveries of odd phenomena on the gas giants). Henden also discussed some indirect ways the lay public can advance science, too, such as with the ever-popular Galaxy Zoo and as potential sources of visually pleasing simulations (after all, who better to get something to look nice than an experienced astroimager?). One particular project that garnered a lot of attention, and even its own talk, was the Epsilon (ε) Aurigae eclipse, which has relied on public participation to achieve fantastic results. “And the good news is, the eclipse is not over!” said the speaker, Robert E. Stencel of the University of Denver Observatories in Colorado, in a semi-call to action.

Not everything highlighted the importance of non-professional astronomers, though. The morning’s big talk, titled “Stars, Planets and The Weather: If You Don’t Like It Wait 5 Billion Years,” was not quite as public-friendly as the others. Luckily, presenter Jeremy Drake of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as the title hints, was an amusing (and often amused) speaker. He regaled the crowds with a thorough look at how stellar weather (both of our Sun and the host stars of distant exoplanets) evolves and how it can affect the development of any nearby planets. For instance, the concept of a star’s habitable zone — where temperatures would be just right for liquid water, and thus life as we know it, to form — is but one factor to consider when judging the true habitability of any planet. Mars technically lies within our Sun’s habitable zone, but its small size and correspondingly weak magnetic field allowed the Sun’s emissions to strip the Red Planet of much of its water. Similarly, if an exoplanet lies within the habitable zone of a red-giant star, it will have a dramatically closer orbit than our world, leading to other potentially fatal stellar weather problems. He closed by mentioning some of the controversial research linking cosmic rays to cloud formation, and how such a relationship would interact with our Sun’s output to help explain some of the weather on Earth. After talking about our local star, our home planet, and the possible living worlds around other stars, Drake finished, “It literally doesn’t get any sexier than that.” How true.

The other fairly technical talk was by Ronald L. Gilliland of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, “Stellar Astrophysics from the Kepler Mission.” Yes, the famous exoplanet-hunting Kepler orbiting telescope has also produced “a real treasure-trove of results” in terms of stellar data, in particular for Sun-like stars and red giants. Before Kepler, astronomers had just about 25 good targets for this kind of research; now they have more than 500. Clearly, Kepler’s been pulling its weight.

The rest of the day’s events, however, did seem especially geared to non-practicing astronomers. First, a press conference titled “The most important object in the history of cosmology” discussed recent Hubble Space Telescope observations of the eponymous object: Hubble variable 1, a Cepheid variable star in the Andromeda Galaxy (M31). It was this star’s varying light that allowed Edwin Hubble to calculate a more accurate distance for Andromeda — and prove that it was not just another nebula in our Milky Way Galaxy, but a galaxy in its own right. As Hubble winds down its operations, it’s a fitting tribute that it observe this famous object for the first time, with the AAVSO’s help (Arne Henden showed up once more), this past winter.

Boston University’s Alan P. Marscher brought down the house with his original songs at an already-packed session discussing novel ways to raise interest in astronomy. // Bill Andrews photoHeartwarming as that is, it pales in comparison to perhaps the liveliest AAS session I’ve ever been to (in all my long year attending). “Astronomy Unexpected! Innovative Strategies for Reaching Non-Traditional Students” featured lively, animated speakers talking about fun, interesting ways to reach unwilling astronomy students, whether it’s actual college students, a fifth-grade class, or your neighbors. The “Galileo Impersonator" put on a great show, and poetry, personal simulations, and even science-fiction movies (yay!) all proved their worth as possible entry points for a good discussion on astronomy. But the final speaker, Alan P. Marscher of Boston University in Massachusetts, brought the house down with two of his original songs, “Relatively Weird” and “Another Planet.” (Check out these and others at http://www.bu.edu/blazars/songs/index.html.) As promised, he delivered interesting facts and ideas through the medium of rock ballad, and even got a few standing ovations. By the session’s end, the crowd was standing-room only.

In fact, that session’s moderator and first speaker, Noreen Grice, also has a book coming out about a different kind of astronomy outreach: making sure to include the disabled. After Astronomy honored the Santa Barbara Astronomical Unit for its similar efforts, it seems only fair to mention Grice’s work, Everyone’s Universe. She even had a special press reception highlighting the book, featuring chocolate chip cookies! Naturally, it was a crowded room — everyone enjoys indulging both their sweet tooth and their humanitarian side.

The day ended with a couple of field trips, or, at least, it was supposed to. Again, both were more about the importance of moving astronomy beyond practicing astronomers. The first, a press night at the Boston Museum of Science’s Charles Hayden Planetarium was just so much fun that I never made it to the second, an open house at the AAVSO’s headquarters. It’s too bad, because I was really curious to see the home of this century-old organization (especially because, as it turns out, I lived four blocks away from it for about a year). But that’s just a testament to the power of the planetarium, which recently finished some serious renovations.

I recall seeing a few shows there in my collegiate youth, but the memories pale in comparison to the dizzying new visual heights the place is now capable of. Guided by the nimble hands of Astronomy Contributing Editor Martin Ratcliffe, we saw in unbelievable clarity the visual processes behind the Moon’s phases, the solar system’s orbital plane, a 3-D rendering of the constellations, and a powerful zoom-out that left the Milky Way Galaxy just a speck within a speck. Ratcliffe gave us a half-show/half-demo mix because so much of the audience was already aware of, say, how lunar eclipses work. If you happen to find yourself in Boston anytime soon, I definitely recommend you check out the newly opened planetarium.

And that was my first day at AAS! Whew! Again, it was a super-crowded and unusually full day, so don’t expect Tuesday’s and Wednesday’s recaps to be similarly extensive. Be sure to check those out right here, though, and remember to follow @AstronomyMag’s live coverage on Twitter (#AAS218).

Related blogs
On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting, Sunday recap

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting preview


Astronomy.com blog

On the Road: American Astronomical Society May 2011 meeting preview

Once again the time has come for a meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS), and this time I’ll be the one heading out to cover it for Astronomy. Officially starting on Sunday, astronomers from all over the country will converge on Boston, the self-styled “Hub of the Universe," to discuss all the latest findings in planetary science, exoplanet research, high-energy astrophysics, cosmology, and so on.

I’ll be blogging and tweeting coverage, sporting the hashtag #AAS218, for the 218th meeting of the AAS. This year, the conference will also meet with the American Association of Variable Star Observers, which celebrates its 100th anniversary in the fall. Their headquarters, along with some of the many interesting science-y destinations in the Boston area, also serve as destinations for certain conference meetings and get-togethers, so it looks to be an extra-exciting year.

Not only am I excited to attend the conference, but it’ll be great to be back in the Boston area, where I spent some time going to school. I haven’t been there in 4 years, so it’ll be nice to visit a few of the old neighborhoods (and perhaps a certain college campus while I’m at it).

Be sure to keep up with the Blogs from the Local Group and @AstronomyMag to hear all about the conference, and if you happen to be attending, make sure to say hi!


Astronomy.com blog

American Astronomical Society meeting: January 13, 2011

Thursday was my last day (or really hour) at the American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting. I went to the morning invited talk, which is usually a great way to figure out what theories, and what scientists, are big in the field right now.

A simplified “longitudinal” map of Earth gives a rough estimate for where landmasses are on our planet. Scientists hope to create such maps from data of earthlike planets, and thus learn if these worlds harbor land. Liz Kruesi photoEric Agol of the University of Washington spoke about exoplanets. He focused on one type of detection method, transits, which occur when a planet crosses in front of its star and thus blocks light according to our view. In particular, Agol talked about what astronomers can do with the information they glean through transiting exoplanets.

The newly discovered worlds Kepler-9b and 9c were two main examples of the talk. These planets are in nearly resonant orbits, with one completing two orbits in the time it takes for the other to complete one. But to figure this out, scientists had to carefully analyze the brightness dips caused whenever the planets passed in front of their star.

He also covered ways to analyze atmospheres, and thus weather, on massive exoplanets called “hot Jupiters.” Years ago, astronomers had begun to figure out general information about one such world, HD 189733b — meaning, they could determine that one part of the atmosphere is hotter than another part, and that this is likely due to high-speed winds. (OK, it’s more complicated than that. See February 2010’s article in Astronomy magazine about weather on exoplanets for more information.)

Agol also showed how this research could extend into analysis of earthlike planets. So, to simulate what such a world’s atmosphere might look like, scientists took images in seven filters of our planet using the Deep Impact spacecraft. They then simulated an extremely basic map to provide an idea of landmasses versus oceans (and thus an estimate of the percent of land). Pretty neat.

After this talk was over, I had to head out of the meeting. Today was the last day, so I’m hopeful I didn’t miss too much. AAS meetings are always packed with information — between press conferences, oral presentations, and posters (not to mention the “town hall” meetings and just running into familiar people). You’ll definitely see some articles in future issues of the magazine from topics that came out of this meeting.

Related blogs:
AAS meeting: January 12, 2011

AAS meeting: January 11, 2011

AAS meeting: January 10, 2011

AAS meeting: January 9, 2011


Astronomy.com blog

American Astronomical Society meeting: January 12, 2011

Wednesday was another busy day at the American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting. I ran into a few contributors to Astronomy magazine (it’s always great to meet the people I talk to on the phone) and my roommate from a summer research internship I did nearly a decade ago.

Wednesday was a big day for the Crab Nebula at the AAS meeting. NASA/ESA photoOK, back to the science. At the first press conference of the day, scientists announced all sorts of crazy stuff happening within the Crab Nebula (aka M1). Actually, they focused on the Crab’s pulsar — a stellar remnant left over from the supernova explosion that created the beautiful nebula. This pulsar emits radiation over broad wavelengths, and astronomers had long considered the pulsar stable in X-rays. So much so that scientists would calibrate their X-ray detectors using the Crab pulsar. It turns out, however, that’s probably not a good idea.

Colleen Wilson of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center announced that her team has seen the Crab’s energy emission decrease by 7 percent since 2008. And this wasn’t just using one detector — they looked at data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Observatory, the Swift satellite, the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, and the INTEGRAL gamma-ray observatory. And this wasn’t the only oddity discovered about the Crab.

The Italian high-energy satellite AGILE detected a gamma-ray flare from the nebula in October 2007. After the observatory saw another flash in September 2010, it became apparent there was some sort of repetition to this signal. AGILE researchers informed the rest of the high-energy astronomy community, and Fermi confirmed the flare just a few days later. The scientists imaged the Crab Nebula’s central region with the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory to see if there were any sources that could have caused the flares. They aren’t sure if the flares originated from the star’s wind, a shock wave around the pulsar, one of the jets, or the gaseous wind structure around the pulsar. The team did see (in both Hubble and Chandra data) several knots of material within one of the pulsar’s jets (and very close to the object itself) that might be related to the gamma-ray signal. They expect another flare within the year, and they hope to have Chandra and Hubble monitor the pulsar when that happens. (You can read even more about the Crab Nebula in the March issue of Astronomy, on newsstands February 1.)

Later in the day, I attended a press conference about black holes. Karl Gebhardt of the University of Texas announced that his team had made the most precise measurement yet of the supermassive black hole within elliptical galaxy M87. This black hole tips the scales at 6.6 billion solar masses. (For comparison, the Milky Way’s central black hole is around 4 million solar masses — more than 1,000 times less massive). This measurement confirms that M87’s black hole is the most massive one in the nearby universe. (Distant quasars are likely closer to 10 billion solar masses, but astronomers can’t directly measure those yet.)

Gebhardt also mentioned that the black hole’s theoretical event horizon (the radius where nothing can escape from) might be 12 billion miles (20 billion kilometers) wide, which is some 3 times the size of Pluto’s orbit. So of the black holes presently known, the one in M87 offers the best chance for astronomers to actually image its event horizon. This is important because, as Gebhardt said, astronomers don’t know if black holes are actually “black holes.” There’s no proof yet of an event horizon. There’s been talk of virtually connecting many sub-millimeter telescopes across the globe in order to essentially create a detector with a diameter of Earth’s radius. This facility could provide the resolution to directly image the event horizon of M87’s supermassive black hole. And that would be awesome.

Related blogs:
AAS meeting: January 11, 2011

AAS meeting: January 10, 2011

AAS meeting: January 9, 2011


Astronomy.com blog

American Astronomical Society meeting: January 11, 2011

The Planck science team released their early results today. While the mission’s main purpose is to study the Big Bang’s “light echo” (the cosmic microwave background, or CMB), it hasn’t yet compiled and analyzed enough data to report on CMB findings. However, as the satellite surveys the radio sky looking for leftover radiation from the Big Bang, it also observes the “stuff” between the CMB and us. On Tuesday the team announced discoveries found in that “stuff” at the January American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting. 

The microwave sky as seen by Planck. ESA imageFirst, George Helou of the California Institute of Technology talked about really cold objects that are the precursors to baby stars. These “cores” are between 7 and 17 kelvin (that’s between about –447° and –429° Fahrenheit). When combining data from Planck and the earlier Infrared Astronomy Satellite (IRAS, from some 2 decades prior), the scientists found about 10,000 cold cores. The Planck team performed follow-up observations on a number of these objects and found that they aren’t so much “cores” as they are “clumps” — the objects aren’t spherical.

The smallest of these cores measure about 1 light-year in size, which is comparable to the extent of the solar system’s Oort Cloud of icy bodies. These cores come before protostars in the star formation process. When asked what stage of human birth these objects can be compared to, Helou responded that they’re equivalent to the mother’s womb before anything has started to form … they’re early on in the star creation process. (As a side note, isn’t that a lovely comparison? I laughed when this question was posed.)

Another result from Planck is on the opposite end of the temperature spectrum. Elena Pierpaoli of the University of Southern California announced the discovery of a whole bunch of galaxy clusters (containing gas with temperatures of tens to hundreds of millions of degrees). The Planck sky survey detected 189 galaxy clusters, 12 of which have been confirmed as newly discovered clusters (and another 8 possible). The other 169 had been observed mainly in X-rays and optical radiation; this was the first time they were seen in radio.

The Planck researchers also gave AAS attendees a timeline for the mission’s CMB findings — we’ll have to wait another 2 years.

Midday, I attended a town hall meeting as a follow-up to the Astro2010 Decadal Survey. A panel of astronomers released this report in August; it provides recommendations for which projects should be the main focus of astronomers in the coming decade. This was a 2-year effort, which the survey panel clearly didn’t take lightly.

Much of the discussion in the town hall meeting focused on funding issues, especially given the current economy. And a number of undergraduate and graduate students asked about career options (how funding shortfalls might affect their futures). I actually found the meeting quite sobering. But, at the same time, it reminded me why what we at Astronomy magazine do is so important: We need to show why astronomy is so awesome, and why the public should care (and thus should pay for astronomical research). Actually, a student brought up the fact that science communication seems to be lacking.

So, dear readers, what do astronomy enthusiasts need to do better? What will help invigorate the field? How can we (the science journalists) explain the science clearer, what other modes/media do we need to involve? I’m interested to read your comments, which you can post below.

Related blogs:
AAS meeting: January 10, 2011
AAS meeting: January 9, 2011


Astronomy.com blog

American Astronomical Society meeting: January 10, 2011

A few exoplanet discoveries kicked off the press conference portion of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting. (Worlds around other stars is a hot topic.) The first presentation came from a study that didn’t find what it was supposed to find. Edward Guinan of Villanova University announced that an undergraduate research project to determine the age of planet-hosting stars turned into quite the discovery. The team found out that there’s a lot of magnetic interaction between one particular star and its planet. (They were looking at the “famous” hot Jupiter HD 189733b and its star HD 189733A.) The star is taking material from the planet and is “spinning up.” This causes it to look much younger than the other star in the system, HD 189733B (that’s an uppercase B).

Kepler-10b is a rocky exoplanet that measures 1.4 times the size of Earth and 4.6 times its mass. NASA imageLater in the same press conference, we learned about a Kepler find. This mission is expected to haul in hundreds of exoplanets (back in June, scientists with the mission revealed they already had some 706 exoplanet candidates). Kepler researcher Natalie Batalha announced that the Kepler team had discovered a planet just 1.4 times the diameter of Earth. The planet (Kepler-10b) isn’t exactly habitable — it’s so close to its star that it orbits in 0.84 Earth day, and its sun-facing side has a temperature of 2500° Fahrenheit (1370° Celsius). Scientists used the planet’s mass and radius to determine its density, which is higher than Earth’s. They think this world contains more iron and nickel than our planet.

Kepler-10b dimmed the light from its star by just 1.5 parts in 10,000. This sensitivity is what makes the Kepler mission (and this discovery) so awesome. At the press conference, scientists talked about the possibility of this super-Earth being the stripped-down core of a hot Jupiter. Whatever it is, the astronomers agreed that it’s a pretty awesome discovery.

The rest of the day’s topics shifted gears — to the high-energy world and black holes. I’m a sucker for particle astrophysics, so the press conference for the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope had me hooked. But no one could deny how cool their discovery was: Fermi scientists detected positrons (the electron’s antiparticle) associated with thunderstorms.

In December 14, 2009, there was an intense thunderstorm above southern Africa. The lightening produced gamma rays, which then interacted with air particles to create electrons and positrons. These charged particles traveled along Earth’s magnetic field lines to where Fermi detected them, some 2,800 miles (4,500 kilometers) away. So, gamma-ray astrophysicists discovered an Earth-science phenomenon — it’s great when findings can reach multiple areas of science. Fermi has actually observed about 130 terrestrial gamma-ray flares, but this was the first where it detected antimatter.

The day involved a number of other announcements (many of which have been posted to the Astronomy magazine news page) and a few invited talks. Interestingly, the afternoon ones had much higher attendance rates than the 8:00 a.m. talk. Astronomers don’t seem to like the mornings — who would’ve thought. It was a busy day, and I’m sure today will be just as crazy.

Related blog:
American Astronomical Society meeting: January 9, 2011


Astronomy.com blog

American Astronomical Society meeting: January 9, 2011

After arriving in Seattle Sunday, I went to the conference center to get my American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting badge and the giant book of abstracts for the next few days. (And I ran into a friend from grad school!) Since then, I’ve been paging through the press meetings, talks, and posters to figure out which ones to attend today.

It’s insane how much research scientists present each day at AAS. To give you an idea, the poster abstracts take up 22 pages with some 15 on each page — that’s 330, just for Monday.

And yes, it’s raining in Seattle. Actually, on the shuttle ride from the airport to my hotel we encountered rain, then sleet, and finally snow!


Astronomy.com blog

American Astronomical Society January 2011 meeting preview

On Sunday the 9th, I’ll head out to Seattle, Washington, to represent Astronomy magazine at the 217th meeting of the American Astronomical Society. I haven’t been to one since 2009, so I’m pretty psyched (plus, Seattle is a wonderful city).

More than 2,700 astronomers will attend the meeting, which will cover topics ranging from planetary science to the history of astronomy to high-energy astrophysics. There are nearly three dozen press announcements scheduled, so expect to see lots of news on www.Astronomy.com/news. I’ll also blog and tweet about the conference, so keep an eye out for my updates.


Astronomy.com blog


Pages


Categories


Tags